Tags: A Christmas Carol Conclusion For An EssayExploratory Research Paper OutlineCollege Essay Prompts For UcfGlobal History Geography Thematic EssayEssay Helping Your CommunityUk Economic Growth EssayCivil War Research PaperJohn Locke An Essay On Human Understanding
Yes, that is a valid argument, but tampering with life is not something I want scientists interfering with.
Cloning of animals is opposed by animal-groups due to the number of cloned animals that suffer from malformations before they die, and while food from cloned animals has been approved by the US FDA, its use is opposed by some other groups concerned about food safety.
There have been numerous demands for all progress in the human cloning field to be halted.
Opponents have also raised concerns about how cloned individuals could integrate with families and with society at large.
Religious groups are divided, with some opposing the technology as usurping God's place and, to the extent embryos are used, destroying a human life; others support therapeutic cloning's potential life-saving benefits.
Proponents claim that human reproductive cloning also would produce benefits to couples who cannot otherwise procreate.
In the early 2000s Severino Antinori and Panos Zavos stirred controversy when they publicly stated plans to create a fertility treatment that allows parents who are both infertile to have children with at least some of their DNA in their offspring.
The World Council of Churches, representing nearly 400 Christian denominations worldwide, opposed cloning of both human embryos and whole humans in February 2006.
The United Methodist Church opposed research and reproductive cloning in May 2000 and again in May 2004.
In bioethics, the ethics of cloning refers to a variety of ethical positions regarding the practice and possibilities of cloning, especially human cloning.
While many of these views are religious in origin, some of the questions raised by cloning are faced by secular perspectives as well.