Tags: Things Fall Apart Tragic Hero EssayAnatomy Anti Hero EssayBeing A Leader EssayTeaching Thesis Statements CollegeObjectives Of DissertationHomework Help Website
Today, parents can see the development of their children with their own eyes.
In the mid-1990s, "pro-life" was a distinct minority view.
("Privacy" is not in the text of the Constitution either.) They also ruled that the word "person" in the Constitution did not include a fetus. For a debate on abortion policy, the most important part of the ruling to understand is the new "law" it established, and here is a description of it that you should commit to memory: The Court ruled that abortion must be permitted for any reason a woman chooses until the child becomes viable; after viability, an abortion must still be permitted if an abortion doctor deems the abortion necessary to protect a woman's "health," defined by the Court in another ruling issued the same day as "all factors--physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age--relevant to the well-being of the patient." In this way the Court created a right to abort a child at any time, even past the point of viability, for "emotional" reasons.
Stated another way, the Supreme Court gave abortion doctors the power to override any abortion restriction merely by claiming that there are "emotional" reasons for the abortion.
Arguing from Science The "classic" arguments from the other side are collapsing under the weight of science.
"No one knows when life begins" and "It's a blob of tissue" are frankly on the wane, especially in the context of surgical abortion, which is how the vast majority of abortions are done today. Still, establishing the evidence of the beginnings of human life will ground your argumentation in science, giving you a firm foundation for additional arguments and preempting the charge that you are basing your position on faith or religious belief.