These should be the first two pieces of information the reader encounters.How similar or variable are the response properties of neighboring neurons in A1?Most often, your result either with the other result.
These should be the first two pieces of information the reader encounters.How similar or variable are the response properties of neighboring neurons in A1?Most often, your result either with the other result.Tags: Term Paper On RussiaWhat Do Business Schools Look For In EssaysMultitasking EssayJ C Bolton DissertationThe Perfect Guy EssayAre Books Underlined Or Quoted In Essays
Are there any obvious organizational principles in local populations?
And to what extent are the responses of individual neurons in the network independent or correlated?
While the introduction starts generally and narrows down to the specific hypothesis, the discussion starts with the interpretation of the results, then moves outwards to contextualize these findings in the general field.
The Discussion section is sort of an odd beast because it is here where you speculate, but must avoid rambling, guessing, or making logical leaps beyond what is reasonably supported for your data.
These findings are consistent with the random connectivity model provided that there is at least one component of the overall connectivity that is strong, sparse and decreases fast with distance.
Such a model would result in the formation of Notably, a subnetworks model would account for the details of the dependence of signal correlation and noise correlation on distance.The solution that has evolved over time is to set up the Discussion section as a "dialogue" between Results and Theories -- yours and everyone elses'.In other words, for every experimental result you want to talk about, you find results from other publications bearing the relationship to your result that you want the reader to understand.As tempting as it may be, avoid over-using the grammatical first person."I" is powerful grammatically and can be intrusive if used too often.Stylistically, the Discussion often reads like a set of bulleted points that happen to be written out in paragraph form.Use subheadings if it makes sense; otherwise, worry less about "flow" between sections than you should in the introduction.The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction.So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by the addition of this new data.This section describes the main elements of a written thesis for the Norwegian bachelor’s and master’s degrees.Although the organising principles described here are most clearly relevant for empirical theses, much of the advice is also relevant for theoretical work.