Tags: Knowledge Is Power Essay 100 WordsExpert AssignmentSomeone Write My Essay For MeAssign RecruitmentSysthesis TheoryCompare China And Japan EssayEssay About Cars
Given the tremendous proliferation of student plagiarism involving the Internet, the purpose of this study is to determine which theory of ethical reasoning students invoke when defending their transgressions: deontology, utilitarianism, rational self-interest, Machiavellianism, cultural relativism, or situational ethics.Understanding which theory of ethical reasoning students employ is critical, as preemptive steps can be taken by faculty to counteract this reasoning and prevent plagiarism.
Likewise, had participants in study been told that they might be “reduced to a twitching, stuttering wreck,” it seems likely that many of them would not have agreed to participate.
In neither of these studies did participants give true informed consent.
Each case was classified according to the primary ethical reasoning that the student used to justify plagiarism.
Results indicate that students predominately invoke deontology, situational ethics, and Machiavellianism.
The idea is that a thorough consideration of the ethics of any research project must take into account how each of the three core principles applies to each of the three groups of people.
Ethics Theories Table Term Papers Ap Open Ended Essays
The guidelines in the TCPS 2 are based on the following three core principles: It may seem obvious what is ethical and what is not, but two studies from our recent past show us that researchers often blur the lines for the sake of science.
Even after the use of penicillin became the standard treatment for syphilis in the 1940s, these men continued to be denied treatment without being given an opportunity to leave the study.
The study was eventually discontinued only after details were made known to the general public by journalists and activists.
This means that researchers obtain and document people’s agreement to participate in a study after having informed them of everything that might reasonably be expected to affect their decision. Although they agreed to participate in the study, they were not told that they had syphilis but would be denied treatment for it.
Had they been told this basic fact about the study, it seems likely that they would not have agreed to participate.